A comparison of most to least prompting, no‐no prompting and responsive prompt delay procedures

Discrete trial training is a commonly used to teach children with autism spectrum disorder and related intellectual disabilities. A number of prompting error correction strategies can be implemented when using discrete training. These need effective efficient. We compared novel procedure, responsive prompt delay, most least no-no prompting. parallel treatments design, nestled in modified multiple probe design (Horner & Baer, 1978), was compare the three procedures participants. The delay procedure at as for participants; time required each participant master skills variable across procedures.